The Mental Health Practice - PRINCIPAL - Tammy Groves, Solicitor
RSS

Delivered by FeedBurner


Recent Posts

Review of the Operation of ss.135 and 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales - April 2014
My heart bleeds when I see vulnerable patients being represented very badly
Do Tribunals love CTOs as much as Psychiatrists do? Part 2
Do Tribunals love CTOs as much as Psychiatrists do?
Patients' experiences of the First-tier Tribunal (Mental Health)

Categories

CTOs Tribunal MP v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2011] UKUT 107 (AAC
Legal aid cuts, Reform of legal aid, House of Commons Justice Committee Report
Patients' experience of Mental Health Tribunals, Report of Administrative Justice and Tribunal's
Qualifications of legal representatives
Review of Mental Health Legislation
RN v CC (2011) UKUT x (AAC, CTOs
S.2, Mental Health Act, Mental Health Law, Tribunal, Application, Tammy Groves,R (Modaresi) v SSH
Zombification, Tony Zigmond, Increase in Admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983, CTOs
powered by

The Mental Health Law Blog

RN v CC (2011) UKUT x (AAC, CTOs

Do Tribunals love CTOs as much as Psychiatrists do? Part 2

A recent case before the Upper Tier Tribunal suggests that perhaps not all Tribunalsdolove CTOs (community treatment orders).
 
In the case ofRN v CC (2011) UKUT x (AAC), the solicitor of a patient detained on s.3 was instructed by her client not to apply for discharge of the section, but rather to ask the Tribunal to use their powers under s.72 (3A) (a) of the Mental Health Act 1983 to recommend that the Responsible Clinician consider whether to make a CTO.  Sounds straight forward enough, but when the Solicitor proceeded to present her case to the Panel at the start of the Tribunal, the Judge stopped her in her tracks and told her that the Tribunal would NOT be making such a recommendation and invited her to consider what other position she might adopt.
Website provided by  Vistaprint
Website
provided by Vistaprint